Almost 200 outstanding cases at Great Grimsby Crown Court

Great Grimsby Crown Court faced a backlog of almost 200 cases at the end of summer, figures show.
The Scales of Justice on top of the Old Bailey, London.The Scales of Justice on top of the Old Bailey, London.
The Scales of Justice on top of the Old Bailey, London.

Great Grimsby Crown Court faced a backlog of almost 200 cases at the end of summer, figures show.

Magistrates are set to be given more sentencing powers in an effort to tackle the pile-up of cases waiting to be dealt with by criminal courts across England and Wales.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But critics warned the plan could have the opposite effect and add to the backlog, while branding it a “sticking plaster” solution.

Ministry of Justice data shows there were 188 outstanding cases at Great Grimsby Crown Court at the end of September last year.

That was a decrease from 199 at the end of June, and 252 at the same point in 2020.

Of the cases outstanding at the end of summer, 48 (26%) related to alleged violent attacks and 22 (12%) were for sex offences.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Across England and Wales, 59,900 cases were waiting to be dealt with by crown courts at the end of September – a slight dip of 1% compared to June, but a 17% increase from 51,280 in September 2020.

Nearly a quarter of cases have been outstanding for a year or more.

Under plans announced by Justice Secretary Dominic Raab, the maximum sentence magistrates can hand out will be doubled to a year.

Currently, crimes warranting a jail term of more than six months are automatically sent to a crown court for sentencing.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Keeping more cases in magistrates’ courts, which havebeen “less severely affected” by Covid, means crown courts can better focustheir resources on tackling the backlog, according to the MoJ.

Mr Raab said: “This important measure will provide vitaladditional capacity to drive down the backlog of cases in the crown courts overthe coming years."

But Alex Cunningham, Labour’s shadow courts andsentencing minister, described the move as “another sticking plaster” solution,adding: “Ministers must give assurances that greater powers for magistrateswon’t inflict even more burden on crown courts – with increased numbers ofappeals overloading a diminishing number of criminal advocates left in the system.”

Mark Fenhalls QC, chairman of the Bar Council, warned thechanges could increase the prison population and put further pressure on theMoJ budget.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Expected to come into force in the coming months, thechanges will only apply to ‘either-way’ offences which can be dealt with bymagistrates or crown courts. It will mean defendants can still opt to havetheir case heard by a jury in a crown court.

Bev Higgs, national chairman of the Magistrates’Association which has campaigned for sentencing powers to be extended, said theorganisation was “delighted” with the announcement, adding: “It is absolutelythe right time to re-align where cases are heard to ensure a safe, effective,and efficient justice system."