Plans for storage of 75,000 tonnes of waste for recycling on airfield thrown out
A company which has stored thousands of tonnes of waste on a former airfield has been told it can’t continue.
Up to 75,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste could have been stored each year on the runway of RAF Strubby near Louth.
Mablethorpe-based MHD Construction Services Ltd was told last year that its current planning permission didn’t apply to an operation of this size, and it would need to apply again.
However Lincolnshire County Council rejected the application at a planning meeting on Monday, saying it shouldn’t be based in the middle of the countryside.


Company director Stephen McCormack said the waste came mainly from caravan parks on Lincolnshire’s east coast, and was recycled back into the construction industry.
The largest stockpile of 13,000 tonnes would have measured 50 metres by 12 metres, and four metres high.
Independent Councillor Marianne Overton said: “I have enormous sympathy for good local businesses trying to make money.
“However, we look at locations and make policies that match what’s best for everyone – both developers and residents.”
Conservative Councillor Martin Hill said the airfield was “very remote” but was concerned about the size.
“This is a massive increase to 75,000 tonnes [from what had been on the site previously.] If it had been lower tonnage, I might have had a different view.
“75,000 tonnes will surely have a visual impact.”
The closest property is a converted airfield tower around 125 metres away.
A statement from Mr McCormack was read to the committee saying: “I have built the company from nothing, and now employ 25 local people.
“We purchased the site from East Lindsey District Council and obtained planning permission, which includes recycling.
“The council’s support will allow us to continue to operate the independent waste management.
“The permission will allow us to import soil and hardcore waste – no household or industrial waste. Once recycled, it will be recycled back into the construction industry.”
The application was refused by the committee, on the recommendation of officers.